I think I've pissed myself

Marathon woman

BBC home page: “London marathon: Jepchirchir wins in women's only world record time”
BBC home page

For those for whom this sort of thing is their sort of thing, the London Marathon was a thing over the weekend. It's not mine, so it'd completely passed me by. And would've continued to do so, if it weren't for the lead on the BBC's home page: Jepchirchir wins in women's only world record time.

Sam Drury opens his report in a similar fashion:

Olympic champion Peres Jepchirchir stormed to victory in a women's only world-record time of two hours 16 minutes and 16 seconds in the London Marathon.

Sam Drury, London Marathon 2024 results: Peres Jepchirchir breaks women's only world record, BBC Sport

But what the hell is the difference between a women's only world record and a straight-down-the-line, common-or-garden women's world record? Y'know, the traditional women's world record of yore.

Our fearless correspondent explains, kinda but not quite: They were on track for women's only record - a record for a marathon run on a course without any male athletes in the race. Hmmm, clear as mud, Sam. There were men running in the same marathon, albeit doing manly man running, not girly running. They were there, on the same course; at least I don't think there were two different courses, one for each of the sexes. (confused)

Or by male athletes in the race, could it refer to men who've conveniently discovered they're women, competing in the women's race because it's easier to win? And easier to set world records. (thinking)